By Ken Y-N (
October 28, 2005 at 23:29)
· Filed under Internet, Mobile, Polls
Advertisement
A new research company to me, Rakuten Research, carried out this recent survey on the use of mobile contents and services, the 18th time they’ve carried it out, but the first time I’ve heard of it!
The survey was carried out at the start of this month amongst Rakuten Research’s monitor group; 2,460 people were selected, almost exactly 50:50 of each sex, with 2,074 of them (86.4%) being mobile phone users from the four main networks, DoCoMo, au, VodaFone and TU-KA. Unless otherwise noted, the sample size for questions are these 2,074 mobile phone users. The main areas of the survey was to find out about the use of “full browsers”, meaning mobile phone browsers that can view PC-based contents, the views on mobile phone information leakage, and communications with eldery parents. However, they have split the results reporting into two articles, so this report is about full browers only. Note that I have translated another survey regarding full browsers.
Q1: Have you used a full browser on your mobile?
| All (N=2,074) |
9.5% |
| Male (N=1,042) |
12.5% |
| Female (N=1,032) |
6.6% |
Q2: For those answering yes to Q1, within the last month, what sorts of web sites have you accessed with the full browser? (Sample size=202, multiple answer)
| Search or portal site |
46.0% |
| News or general info site |
37.1% |
| Traffic, maps or travel |
26.7% |
| Shopping |
21.8% |
| Blog |
19.8% |
| Bulletin board |
18.3% |
| Auction |
17.8% |
| Single-function service (dictionary, translation, etc) |
10.4% |
| Other |
7.9% |
Q3: For those answering yes to Q1, after using the full browser, how has your frequency of access to mobile phone-targetted sites changed? (Sample size=202)
| Hardly ever access previously-used mobile sites |
35.1% |
| Frequency of access of mobile sites has decreased |
13.4% |
| Frequency of access of mobile sites has not changed |
42.1% |
| Frequency of access of mobile sites has increased |
9.4% |
Q4: For those answering yes to Q1, after using the full browser, how has your frequency of access to mobile phone-targetted pay sites changed? (Sample size=202)
| Now never access previously-used paid-for mobile contents |
47.0% |
| Amount spend on paid-for mobile contents has decreased |
15.3% |
| Amount spend on paid-for mobile contents has not changed |
30.2% |
| Amount spend on paid-for mobile contents has increased |
7.4% |
Q5: What issues might crop up (or have cropped up) as a result of using a full browser? (Sample size=2,074, multiple answer)
| Packet charge increase |
60.8% |
| Phone screen size too small |
44.3% |
| Corrupted character encodings or screen layout broken |
28.1% |
| Few usable features |
25.9% |
| Worry about viruses or accessing dodgy sites |
25.5% |
| Response from web servers slow |
25.3% |
| Poor usability |
20.6% |
| Cannot view Javascript or Flash-based high-spec sites |
15.9% |
| Others |
2.4% |
| No particular problems or worries |
19.2% |
Finally, the trends of usage patterns of various major features of mobile phones were investigated. For each of the main functions of the phone, each respondent was asked if they had used it within the last month. Looking back at the historical data the following trends can be seen:
- Picture mail usage has increased from 36.4% to 40.5% in the last two months
- Bar code and QR Code scans are up from 17.6% to 21.5%
- Infrared usage also up from 14.4% to 16.6%
- Usage of all other features up, but none very significantly
- However, electronic money feature usage is still less than 2%
Read more on: full browser,
Internet,
mobile phone,
rakuten research
Permalink
By Ken Y-N (
October 12, 2005 at 22:46)
· Filed under Internet, Mobile, Polls
NEOPRO JAPAN Mobile Report issue 26 recently published a report on accessing web sites and documents designed for PC use, or at least not designed with mobile phone access in mind. The average browser on a mobile phone is limited by various constraints, not just by the obvious limitation of screen size, but also by page data length – two to five kilobytes seems the usual limit – and by picture complexity and formats, to name a couple of other restrictions. There has been TV advertising for mobiles that can get round this limitation, but the question is are people interested in using these features? There’s also the supplementary question about whether or not once the access limitation is got round, is it actually practical to use your mobile to read the BBC? This issue is not addressed, however.
The survey was conducted on September the 8th and 9th through the iMode, Vodafone live! and EZweb public sites with some sort of prize promotion to get respondents. 4,216 people completed the self-selecting survey, 60% female, with 38% and 41% in their twenties and thirties respectively.
Q1: Would it be useful if you could view PC-facing web sites or files on your mobile phone?
| Really useful |
46% |
| Useful |
34% |
| Perhaps, perhaps not |
10% |
| Useful, but I wouldn’t use |
8% |
| Other |
1% |
| No answer |
1% |
Q2: Have you ever downloaded software to allow you to view PC-facing web sites or files on your mobile?
| No, but I want to try it |
58% |
| No, and have no interest |
17% |
| Yes, a free download |
15% |
| No, as my mobile phone already has that feature built-in |
4% |
| Yes, a paid download |
3% |
| Other |
2% |
| No answer |
1% |
Q3: If you could view PC-facing web sites on your mobile, what sort of sites would you want to use? (Multiple answer)
| News, maps, weather |
41% |
| Auctions |
37% |
| Fortune-telling or games |
34% |
| Bulletin board reading and writing |
33% |
| Others |
32% |
| Railway info search |
21% |
| Blogs |
20% |
| Chat |
15% |
| Social networking site |
8% |
Q4: Which of the following have you viewed, or would like to view, on your mobile phone? (Multiple answer)
| PC mail |
41% |
| Others |
32% |
| Excel files |
31% |
| Word files |
30% |
| PDF files |
14% |
| PowerPoint files |
13% |
Read more on: full browser,
mobile phone,
nepro japan
Permalink