DIMSDRIVE Research recently reported on a survey conducted last year into beauty equipment.
Demographics
Between the 2nd and 16th of September 2010 (not 2011) 6,436 members of the DIMSDRIVE monitor group completed a private internet-based questionnaire. 50.5% of the sample were female, 0.3% in their teens, 11.2% in their twenties, 32.7% in their thirties, 36.0% in their forties, 17.9% in their fifties, and 1.9% aged sixty or older.
My wife fancies a steamer, in particular this device, as the word on the street is very positive, it seems. The roller type mentioned in the survey have been in vogue the last couple of years, being platinum and/or germanium-coated rollers that you roll over your face and miracles happen! This smells completely and utterly of snake-oil to me; I could accept an argument that the rolling in itself had some benefit, but the metals are just flat-out quackery.
Research results
Q1: Which conditions, diseases of the skin, face are you usually concerned about? (Sample size=6,436, multiple answer)
Male N=3,183
Female N=3,253
Open pores
11.5%
54.4%
Stains, freckles
9.6%
50.3%
Wrinkles, flabbiness
16.0%
47.1%
Lack of lustre, shadows
10.7%
46.7%
Dry skin
14.5%
27.5%
Acne, pimples
14.8%
26.5%
Discolouring
4.2%
24.0%
Rough skin
7.7%
21.5%
Thick hair
10.2%
19.7%
Sunburn
3.9%
17.4%
Oily skin
25.3%
15.8%
Sensitive skin
6.7%
15.8%
Keratinisation (corns)
2.5%
10.5%
Allergy
6.4%
8.7%
Razor nicks
21.8%
4.4%
Prominent blood vessels
0.8%
3.3%
Other
0.4%
0.6%
Nothing in particular
33.5%
4.2%
Don’t want to answer
2.6%
1.1%
Q2A: Which of the following kinds of beauty equipment do you have? (Sample size=6,436, multiple answer)
I agree with you so much about the roller “beauty equipment”. To me, most of that stuff seems like overpriced-gadgetry.
I kind of wish there were a scientific study on these kinds of things. I imagine it would be difficult to claim “completely dissatisfied” if one spent a fortune on some magical thing that you roll on your face that doesn’t seem to do anything one way or another. With the kinds of marketing and price tag those things have it would seem ridiculous to think they weren’t effective. I think there is a lot of snake-oil on the Japanese market. Maybe they need more scientific studies… if they do exist they need a way to let people know about those kinds of fraudulent things effectively.
I’ve seen a lot more audio file snake oil in Japan vs. America as well. So I think beauty equipment is just the tip of the iceberg as far as that kind of stuff goes.
I agree with you so much about the roller “beauty equipment”. To me, most of that stuff seems like overpriced-gadgetry.
I kind of wish there were a scientific study on these kinds of things. I imagine it would be difficult to claim “completely dissatisfied” if one spent a fortune on some magical thing that you roll on your face that doesn’t seem to do anything one way or another. With the kinds of marketing and price tag those things have it would seem ridiculous to think they weren’t effective. I think there is a lot of snake-oil on the Japanese market. Maybe they need more scientific studies… if they do exist they need a way to let people know about those kinds of fraudulent things effectively.
I’ve seen a lot more audio file snake oil in Japan vs. America as well. So I think beauty equipment is just the tip of the iceberg as far as that kind of stuff goes.