Beauty equipment usage in Japan

Advertisement

DIMSDRIVE Research recently reported on a survey conducted last year into beauty equipment.

Demographics

Between the 2nd and 16th of September 2010 (not 2011) 6,436 members of the DIMSDRIVE monitor group completed a private internet-based questionnaire. 50.5% of the sample were female, 0.3% in their teens, 11.2% in their twenties, 32.7% in their thirties, 36.0% in their forties, 17.9% in their fifties, and 1.9% aged sixty or older.

My wife fancies a steamer, in particular this device, as the word on the street is very positive, it seems. The roller type mentioned in the survey have been in vogue the last couple of years, being platinum and/or germanium-coated rollers that you roll over your face and miracles happen! This smells completely and utterly of snake-oil to me; I could accept an argument that the rolling in itself had some benefit, but the metals are just flat-out quackery.


Research results

Q1: Which conditions, diseases of the skin, face are you usually concerned about? (Sample size=6,436, multiple answer)

  Male
N=3,183
Female
N=3,253
Open pores 11.5% 54.4%
Stains, freckles 9.6% 50.3%
Wrinkles, flabbiness 16.0% 47.1%
Lack of lustre, shadows 10.7% 46.7%
Dry skin 14.5% 27.5%
Acne, pimples 14.8% 26.5%
Discolouring 4.2% 24.0%
Rough skin 7.7% 21.5%
Thick hair 10.2% 19.7%
Sunburn 3.9% 17.4%
Oily skin 25.3% 15.8%
Sensitive skin 6.7% 15.8%
Keratinisation (corns) 2.5% 10.5%
Allergy 6.4% 8.7%
Razor nicks 21.8% 4.4%
Prominent blood vessels 0.8% 3.3%
Other 0.4% 0.6%
Nothing in particular 33.5% 4.2%
Don’t want to answer 2.6% 1.1%

Q2A: Which of the following kinds of beauty equipment do you have? (Sample size=6,436, multiple answer)

  Bought myself Received it Don’t have one
Roller type 8.5% 2.3% 89.3%
Steam type 4.4% 1.7% 94.0%
Ultrasonic type 4.3% 0.9% 94.8%
Ion generating type 3.8% 0.7% 95.5%
Ultrasonic plus ion type 3.1% 0.4% 96.5%
Any type (to SQs) 19.4%   80.6%

Q2B: Which of the following kinds of beauty equipment do you have? (Sample size=3,253, female, multiple answer)

  Bought myself Received it Don’t have one
Roller type 14.4% 3.3% 82.4%
Steam type 6.9% 2.3% 90.8%
Ultrasonic type 7.1% 1.3% 91.6%
Ion generating type 6.3% 1.0% 92.8%
Ultrasonic plus ion type 5.2% 0.6% 94.3%
Any type 32.6%   67.4%


Q2SQ1: How often do you use the beauty equipment you have? (Sample size=1,250)

Roller type

Almost every day 16.6%
Four or five days a week 9.7%
Two or three days a week 17.6%
One day a week 14.7%
Two or three days a month 7.0%
One day a month 4.7%
Once every two or three months 3.3%
Less than that 11.9%
Never 14.5%

Steam type

Almost every day 15.9%
Four or five days a week 4.6%
Two or three days a week 10.0%
One day a week 10.0%
Two or three days a month 9.5%
One day a month 8.2%
Once every two or three months 4.1%
Less than that 16.2%
Never 21.5%

Ultrasonic type

Almost every day 10.4%
Four or five days a week 5.0%
Two or three days a week 11.3%
One day a week 8.0%
Two or three days a month 9.8%
One day a month 5.6%
Once every two or three months 5.0%
Less than that 16.3%
Never 28.6%

Ion generating type

Almost every day 12.8%
Four or five days a week 5.9%
Two or three days a week 11.1%
One day a week 11.8%
Two or three days a month 8.0%
One day a month 4.2%
Once every two or three months 4.2%
Less than that 17.3%
Never 24.7%

Ultrasonic and ion type

Almost every day 14.0%
Four or five days a week 6.6%
Two or three days a week 13.2%
One day a week 11.4%
Two or three days a month 12.3%
One day a month 5.3%
Once every two or three months 5.3%
Less than that 11.0%
Never 20.9%

The following two supplementary questions were for the people who had bought equipment themselves.

Q2SQ2: From where did you get information about the beauty equipment you bought? (Sample size=1,038, multiple answer)

Internet comparison site, word of mouth site, etc 31.5%
Friends, family 18.1%
Television advertisement 14.0%
Magazine, book 13.9%
Shop staff recommendation 13.1%
Mail-order web site 11.7%
Television 11.6%
In-shop promotional display 11.3%
Printed advertisement 8.9%
Television shopping 8.6%
Mail-order magazine 7.5%
Twitter, blog, SNS, etc 6.0%
Other 2.8%
Nothing in particular 8.6%

Q2SQ3: Why, instead of supplements, cosmetics, etc, did you buy beauty equipment? (Sample size=1,038, multiple answer)

Seemed to be highly effect 37.5%
Seemed to have some effect 31.1%
Seemed easy to use 30.2%
Can always use it 29.7%
Seemed easy to continue to use 25.5%
Seemed to soon have an effect 14.7%
Functions without supplements, cosmetics, etc 13.6%
Popular, highly rated 11.6%
Other family members, etc, can also use it 5.4%
No worries about allergies 5.4%
Other 2.4%
No particular reason 6.6%

The following supplementary question was for the people who actually use their equipment.

Q2SQ4: How satisfied are you with the beauty equipment that you use? (Sample size=1,013)

Steam type

Satisified 15.7%
Somewhat satisfied 45.1%
Can’t say 31.4%
Somewhat dissatisied 6.2%
Dissatisfied 1.6%

Ultrasonic type

Satisified 14.9%
Somewhat satisfied 40.3%
Can’t say 34.0%
Somewhat dissatisied 8.7%
Dissatisfied 2.1%

Ultrasonic plus ion type

Satisified 14.4%
Somewhat satisfied 38.4%
Can’t say 37.8%
Somewhat dissatisied 6.1%
Dissatisfied 3.3%

Ion generating type

Satisified 15.2%
Somewhat satisfied 33.2%
Can’t say 35.9%
Somewhat dissatisied 12.0%
Dissatisfied 3.7%

Roller type

Satisified 8.3%
Somewhat satisfied 33.0%
Can’t say 45.0%
Somewhat dissatisied 11.1%
Dissatisfied 2.6%

Q3: Which of the following beauty equipment might you like to buy for yourself in the future? (Sample size=6,436, multiple answer)

  Male
N=3,183
Female
N=3,253
Ultrasonic plus ion type 7.9% 25.5%
Roller type 4.2% 20.8%
Steam type 5.0% 20.3%
Ion generating type 4.0% 12.5%
Ultrasonic type 3.6% 9.5%
Don’t want to buy any 84.4% 47.7%
Read more on: ,

Custom Search

1 Comment »

  1. Steven said,
    October 19, 2011 @ 12:55

    I agree with you so much about the roller “beauty equipment”. To me, most of that stuff seems like overpriced-gadgetry.

    I kind of wish there were a scientific study on these kinds of things. I imagine it would be difficult to claim “completely dissatisfied” if one spent a fortune on some magical thing that you roll on your face that doesn’t seem to do anything one way or another. With the kinds of marketing and price tag those things have it would seem ridiculous to think they weren’t effective. I think there is a lot of snake-oil on the Japanese market. Maybe they need more scientific studies… if they do exist they need a way to let people know about those kinds of fraudulent things effectively.

    I’ve seen a lot more audio file snake oil in Japan vs. America as well. So I think beauty equipment is just the tip of the iceberg as far as that kind of stuff goes.

Leave a Comment