Nuclear power now and 10 years hence
Advertisement
Actually, this survey would be more accurately headlined “Nuclear power last year and 9 years hence” as it was conducted last September, well before everything went all pear-shaped in Fukushima. The official title for this survey from Central Research Service Inc was the environment and energy problems.
Demographics
At some point in September 2010, 3,000 people over the age of twenty selected at random from the Kansai prefectures of Osaka, Kyoto, Hyogo, Nara, Wakayama and Shiga and 1,500 people from Fukui prefecture (where all Kansai’s nuclear reactors are situated) were sent a survey by post. 1,082 people from Kansai (36%) and 569 (38%) from Fukui returned the completed survey. A breakdown by age and sex was not reported.
I’ve previously reported on a similar survey by the same company into nuclear power in Kansai, which may serve as a useful cross-reference.
Research results
Q1: How interested are you in global environmental issues? (Sample size=1,651)
Kansai
N=1,082Fukui
N=569Interested 67% 61% Can’t say 1% 2% Not interested 33% 37% Furthermore, men were slightly more interested than women, and while only 45% or so of those in their twenties were interested, 70% of the over sixties were.
Q2: How do you see the global warming issue in ten years time? (Sample size=1,651)
Kansai
N=1,082Fukui
N=569Worse than now 61% 58% About the same as now 23% 24% Better than now 8% 9% Don’t know 9% 9% Women were more pessimistic, and almost three-quarters of those in their twenties were too, whereas about 55% of those sixty or over were.
Q3: How interested are you in energy issues? (Sample size=1,651)
Kansai
N=1,082Fukui
N=569Interested 71% 69% Can’t say 3% 3% Not interested 27% 29% Over 10 percentage points more men than women were interested, and about 20 percentage points more retired people than those in their twenties were.
Q4: What do you think bears the main burden of electricity generation in Japan today? (Sample size=1,651)
Kansai
N=1,082Fukui
N=569Oil 34% 39% Hydro 5% 6% Nuclear 47% 42% Commercial solar 2% 1% Domestic solar 0% 0% Coal 1% 4% Natural gas 2% 1% Fuel cells 0% 0% Geothermal 0% 0% Wind power 0% 0% Other 0% 0% Don’t know 9% 8% Q5: What do you think will bear the main burden of electricity generation in Japan in ten years time? (Sample size=1,651)
Kansai
N=1,082Fukui
N=569Oil 3% 3% Hydro 1% 2% Nuclear 42% 51% Commercial solar 25% 18% Domestic solar 7% 7% Coal 0% 0% Natural gas 2% 2% Fuel cells 2% 2% Geothermal 0% 0% Wind power 1% 1% Other 1% 1% Don’t know 16% 14% In the main Kansai area, 51% of males but only 35% of females reckoned nuclear power would be the mainstay in ten years time. For commercial solar the figures were 21% versus 28%. Across all the age groups too, nuclear led solar. However, in Fukui 63% of those in their thirties chose nuclear versus just 9% for commercial solar, although the reason for this is not described.
Q6: How interested are you in nuclear power generation? (Sample size=1,651)
Kansai
N=1,082Fukui
N=569Interested 66% 78% Can’t say 1% 2% Not interested 33% 20% Interest in nuclear power was much higher for men and for older people.
Nuclear power is still important and should have a diversified energy policy, reduce reliance on it but don’t see the need to quit that…don’t forget there’s thorium and fusion energy people!
China, France, USA are moving ahead with nuclear power plants without issue!
I lived in Fukui for the most part since 1995, all of it in Tsuruga, which is a nuclear power town. It would be interesting to see where the Fukui surveys were sent; there are, generally speaking, two geographic regions in Fukui, Reinan (Tsuruga and Wakasa Bay, where the reactors are) and Reihoku (the main urban center of Fukui, and home to about 750,000 people).
Like everywhere else in Japan, regional identity is strong – the two regions have totally different dialects (Tsuruga resembles Kansai dialect, Obama resembles Kyoto dialect, while Fukui proper resembles Tohoku dialect). As a result, people don’t really intermingle, and Tsuruga and the Wakasa region is out of sight, and out of mind. Despite the fact that the prefecture receives significant revenues as a result of nuclear power, people in the northern, more populous part of the prefecture (until Fukushima) probably never gave nuclear power much thought.
People in northern Fukui don’t commute to the plants to work, and most of the service-providers are located in Tsuruga (Mihama, Obama, Takahama and Oi have received very few meaningful and sustainable economic benefits from the plants) or Kansai.
So, basically, it’s actually quite important to find out where the surveys were sent.
Monju is a future generation by the way, ad yes just like oil is doig to dubai, you bet Tsuruga rakes in the cash! Which explains their spiffed up fireworks festival! They are rich dude!
Giving up Monju would not be a smart move and earthquakes almost never happen in Fukui Prefecture interestingly enough except that one 70 years ago! A rarity at that! Western Japan is just lucky!
And Mr. Kan is brainless for giving up so easily on nuclear power, Monju is more important than you think, and Tsuruga sits in the riches thanks to Monju and the fireworks at Tsuruga are the result of pure awesomeness! Cannot wait for Mr. Cannot to resign!
Haste makes waste and paranoia and giving up so easily is not the answer folks.
もんじゅうは重要です、敦賀のための豊か! エネルギーのためにも!かんちゃんはばかたれだな!
The fireworks in Tsuruga really are fantastic, and we do have Nihon Genden to thank for it!
That is my point, Dubai is soaked in riches so far due to oil, thus same goes for the Monju Fast Breeder, not hard to see that lol.
With this clown Kan, I am concerned and playing on peopes fears and stoking the paranoia, and as always we just follow along as sheep and too gutless still to take a stand and tell Kan he is an idiot and that we are important too besides the bubble world you call the Diet lol, there is this Berlin Wall that exists here in Japan folks.
Don’t worry, there will be lots of money pumped into Tsuruga even if Monju is permanently shut down. These facilities take 25 years to clean up. For whatever it’s worth, I think Kan is a hero. He’s an engineer, he didn’t go to an Ivy League school, and did not inherit his office from his father. His family does not control a large industrial conglomerate, and he’s not married into the kizoku. Just a regular guy trying to fight the nuclear power lobby.
Energy sufficiency and energy independence are going to be key, Monju is not unsafe if safety is top priority ad avoid human error bottom line!
Japan needs energy,!
If Kan takes away Monju, which i hope he and Japan doesn’t where he will resign soon enough, this will severely strip the wealth away from western Japan! And Tsuruga fireworks will fizzle
Monju is future generation energy and tons of money hasgone intothis thing, scrapping thisad that seems to be Kan issue, the fact he scrappedthe supercomputer projectin Kobe was really sad! Can never forgive him for that one!
Monju and nuclear energy have a futurr, just look at Fusion and thorium, something I am surprised has not caught up on.
Hey apan, are you living in Tsuruga?
Close enough Nevin and just hope people realize how important and precious Monju is and that it is not a bad thing, also this area is blessed with few earthquakes to begin with!