By Ken Y-N ( February 15, 2011 at 01:07)
· Filed under Business, Politics, Polls
Advertisement
With the termination of the Eco Car subsidy being largely responsible for the recently-announced 1.1% drop in Japan’s GDP for the previous quarter, this seems a good time to look at how the public perceived the scheme through the results of a survey from DIMSDRIVE Research.
Demographics
Between the 21st of October and the 5th of November 2010 7,681 members of the DIMSDRIVE monitor group completed a private internet-based questionnaire. 52.9% of the sample were male, 0.7% in their teens, 10.6% in their twenties, 29.9% in their thirties, 32,5% in their forties, 17.6% in their fifties, and 8.7% in their sixties.
From an economic standpoint, the Eco Car scheme was good for opening wallets and getting money circulating, the biggest issue these days in the Japanese economy. From an environmental standpoint, however, a lot of cars were upgraded earlier that they needed be, the life and recycling of the batteries in hybrids is still an open question, and due to the way the scheme was structured, a lot of cars were not really that ecologically sound. A good diesel, such as on a Volkswagen, can outrun most other cars, although diesel does not have a good image in Japan.
Research results
Q1: Do you have a standard car driving license? (Sample size=7,681)
Q2: Do you have a family-use car? (Sample size=7,681)
Looking at the figures by regions, the two major metropolitan areas had significantly lower car ownership figures; 68.1% in the Tokyo Kanto area, 75.8% in the Osaka Kinki area. Surprisingly enough, the next lowest figure was for the least densely-populated area, Hokkaido, with 85.8% having a car.
Q3: When buying a car for the family, to what degree are you involved? (Sample size=7,681)
| Main decision maker |
46.2% |
| One of the decision makers |
22.1% |
| Just express my opinions |
16.5% |
| Not involved, don’t know |
15.2% |
Q4: How often do you drive the family-use car? (Sample size=5,558, licence holders and have a family car)
| Almost every day |
35.5% |
| Four or five times a week |
13.7% |
| Twice or thrice a week |
21.3% |
| Once a week |
13.2% |
| Twice or thrice a month |
4.4% |
| Once a month |
2.3% |
| Less than that |
3.6% |
| Never |
6.0% |
Q5: Do you have an Eco Car in the family? (Sample size=7,681)
| Have an Eco Car (to SQ1, SQ2, SQ3) |
11.1% |
| Don’t have an Eco Car |
63.4% |
| Don’t know |
3.1% |
| Don’t have any car |
22.4% |
Q5SQ1: Why did you choose an Eco Car? (Sample size=853)
| Good fuel consumption |
79.6% |
| Kind to the environment |
46.0% |
| Eco car purchase support system |
45.1% |
| Eco car tax reduction system |
44.1% |
| It’s the trend in society |
3.2% |
| Other |
2.3% |
| No particular reason |
4.8% |
| Don’t know |
2.0% |
Q5SQ2: When buying your Eco Car, were you aware of the Eco Car tax break? (Sample size=853)
| Yes |
62.1% |
| No |
15.4% |
| System wasn’t in place |
19.9% |
| Don’t know |
2.6% |
Q5SQ3: When buying your Eco Car, did you make use of the Eco Car subsidy? (Sample size=853)
| Used it (to SQ4) |
57.0% |
| Didn’t use it |
3.6% |
| Wasn’t such a system |
30.9% |
| Car didn’t qualify for the system |
4.7% |
| Don’t know |
3.8% |
Q5SQ4: If there had not been an Eco Car subsidy scheme, what effect would it have had on your car purchasing? (Sample size=468)
| Would have put off buying |
49.4% |
| Would not have bought |
16.9% |
| Would have bought a different car |
11.7% |
| Other |
0.0% |
| Would have had no effect |
30.5% |
Q6: Did you know that the Eco Car subsidy scheme had ended? (Sample size=7,681)
| Yes |
93.7% |
| No |
4.1% |
| Didn’t know about it at all |
2.2% |
Q7: When does your family plan to buy a car? (Sample size=7,681)
| Within six months (to SQs) |
2.9% |
| Within a year (to SQs) |
4.7% |
| Within two years (to SQs) |
4.9% |
| Within three years (to SQs) |
4.7% |
| More than three years hence (to SQs) |
5.6% |
| Plan to buy, but not decided when (to SQs) |
25.5% |
| Don’t have plans to buy |
51.7% |
Q7SQ1: Does your family plan to buy an Eco Car? (Sample size=3,710)
| Plan to buy Eco Car |
14.6% |
| Plan to investigate non-Eco Cars too |
50.9% |
| Don’t plan to buy Eco Car |
8.1% |
| Don’t know yet |
26.4% |
Q7SQ2: What is important when choosing a car for family use? (Sample size=3,710, multiple answer)
| Cost |
76.3% |
| Type (sedan, one-box, sports car, etc |
59.0% |
| Maker |
58.2% |
| Model |
56.3% |
| Low fuel consumption |
53.4% |
| Design |
51.9% |
| Safety |
39.5% |
| Running cost |
39.4% |
| Ride quality |
38.0% |
| Colour |
37.3% |
| Interior space |
34.8% |
| Whether it fits my needs |
30.7% |
| Number of passengers |
23.4% |
| Fits my family situation |
19.0% |
| Hybrid engine |
15.5% |
| Qualifies for eco car tax reduction |
11.8% |
| Percentage of eco car tax reduction |
9.6% |
| Electric vehicle |
6.3% |
| Whether it is popular model |
2.4% |
| Other |
1.4% |
| Nothing in particular |
1.1% |
| Don’t know |
1.2% |
Read more on: dimsdrive reasearch,
eco car
Permalink
Hi! thanks for your info.