<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Family budgets: situation after marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatjapanthinks.com/2011/01/13/family-budgets-situation-after-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2011/01/13/family-budgets-situation-after-marriage/</link>
	<description>From kimono to keitai; research Japanese facts and figures through translated opinion polls and surveys.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 22:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: otaku 1.2の徹底研究【Otaku-Girl】</title>
		<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2011/01/13/family-budgets-situation-after-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-243779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[otaku 1.2の徹底研究【Otaku-Girl】]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatjapanthinks.com/?p=3614#comment-243779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Family budgets: situation after marriage &#124; 世論 What Japan ThinksN=220, Female N=252. Should know both, 50.2%, 45.9%, 55.6%. Should know salary only, 22,4%, 19.4%, 26.2%. Should know savings only, 2.1%, 2.8%, 1.2%. No need to know either, 25.3%, 31.9%, 17.1% &#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Family budgets: situation after marriage | 世論 What Japan ThinksN=220, Female N=252. Should know both, 50.2%, 45.9%, 55.6%. Should know salary only, 22,4%, 19.4%, 26.2%. Should know savings only, 2.1%, 2.8%, 1.2%. No need to know either, 25.3%, 31.9%, 17.1% &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cleo</title>
		<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2011/01/13/family-budgets-situation-after-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-243704</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cleo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 19:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatjapanthinks.com/?p=3614#comment-243704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m surprised that the majority answered that they weren&#039;t able to save more money from being married.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that the majority answered that they weren&#8217;t able to save more money from being married.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillaume</title>
		<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2011/01/13/family-budgets-situation-after-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-243677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guillaume]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 05:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatjapanthinks.com/?p=3614#comment-243677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As with most surveys you published, I would like to point the fact that the sample is not representative of the Japanese population (since it is a private survey based on the answers from a private club). The results are worthless without additional information concerning the composition of your sample compared to the overall population (demographics, socio-economic status, income). Some of the questions have a such small sample size (151) that it would be a joke to pretend this has any significance. This has no more scientific value than any of the internet polls you see on most websites.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with most surveys you published, I would like to point the fact that the sample is not representative of the Japanese population (since it is a private survey based on the answers from a private club). The results are worthless without additional information concerning the composition of your sample compared to the overall population (demographics, socio-economic status, income). Some of the questions have a such small sample size (151) that it would be a joke to pretend this has any significance. This has no more scientific value than any of the internet polls you see on most websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
