By Ken Y-N ( July 2, 2009 at 23:12)
· Filed under Lifestyle, Polls
Advertisement
This recent survey from DIMSDRIVE Research into pets had interesting information regarding insurance, but sadly the number of pets per person were not reported, a figure that would have helped in understanding some of the numbers.
Demographics
Between the 11th and 26th of March 2009 10,501 members of the DIMSDRIVE monitor group completed a private internet-based questionnaire. The sample was 50:50 male and female (one more female than male, but she was lost in rounding), 1.1% were in their teens, 13.1% in their twenties, 33.8% in their thirties, 30.6% in their forties, 14.7% in their fifties, and 6.7% aged sixty or older. Additional demographic information included 51.4% lived in a house, 33.5% in a flat, 12.7% in an apartment, and 2.4% in other accommodation.
I really don’t like pet shops in Japan at all; the cages on display are far too small, and they take the animals away from their mothers too early – about six weeks is the standard figure, while they are still cute enough to sell. I remember last year seeing one male kitten that was so desparate for mother’s milk that it had taken to sucking his own nipple, pulling out a lot of his own hair and leaving a big ugly raw-red mark on his chest.
Research results
Q1: Do you have a pet? (Sample size=10,501)
| Yes |
35.1% |
| Used to have but not now (to Q8) |
43.3% |
| Never (to Q8) |
21.6% |
The bigger the family, the more chance of having a pet; only 17.5% of people living alone had one, yet 47.6% of families of five or more people had one. Similarly, those living in houses were more likely to have pets than those in shared accommodation.
Q2: What kinds of pet do you have? (Sample size=3,688, those currently with pets, multiple answer)
| Dog |
46.0% |
| Cat |
31.9% |
| Goldfish, koi carp |
14.6% |
| Tropical fish |
9.5% |
| Tortoise, turtle |
7.0% |
| Bird |
6.4% |
| Other fish |
5.1% |
| Hamster, marmott |
4.9% |
| Rabbit |
4.8% |
| Insect |
2.8% |
| Amphibian, reptile |
1.5% |
| Ferret |
1.0% |
| Other small animal |
0.6% |
| Squirrel |
0.5% |
| Other |
1.2% |
Q3: Why do you have a pet? (Sample size=3,688, those currently with pets, multiple answer)
| Healing |
83.4% |
| Things are more fun |
39.2% |
| Inter-family talk increased |
39.0% |
| Home has become brighter |
33.2% |
| Not lonely |
23.5% |
| Useful for children’s upbringing |
19.3% |
| Friends have increased thanks to the pet |
13.9% |
| Useful for crime prevention |
10.4% |
| Fixed problem of a lack of exercise |
9.2% |
| Lifestyle has become more regular |
8.0% |
| Other |
0.9% |
| Nothing in particular |
6.5% |
Q4: About how much do you spend per month on your pet? (Sample size=3,688, those currently with pets)
| Up to 1,000 yen |
22.5% |
| Up to 3,000 yen |
26.4% |
| Up to 5,000 yen |
19.7% |
| Up to 8,000 yen |
6.6% |
| Up to 10,000 yen |
10.2% |
| Up to 20,000 yen |
4.1% |
| 20,000 yen or more |
2.5% |
| Don’t know |
8.0% |
The question does not make it clear if the cost was per pet or the sum of all pets per respondent.
Cats were cheaper than dogs, with 40.6% of people owned by cats spending less than 3,000 yen, whereas only 31.8% of dog owners spent that little.
Q5: Where do you usually buy pet food, pet goods, etc? (Sample size=3,688, those currently with pets, multiple answer)
| Home centre, discount store |
70.5% |
| Pet shop |
26.7% |
| Supermarket |
25.9% |
| Internet |
18.6% |
| Drug store |
16.4% |
| Pet goods shop |
12.7% |
| Vet clinic |
7.5% |
| Convenience store |
2.0% |
| Department store |
1.5% |
| Pet grooming salon |
1.3% |
| Other delivery |
0.9% |
| Other |
0.9% |
| Don’t buy pet food, pet goods |
1.5% |
Q6: Which of the following services do you often use? (Sample size=3,688, those currently with pets, multiple answer)
| Pet grooming |
17.4% |
| Pet hotel |
6.1% |
| Pet sitter |
0.9% |
| Pet massage service |
0.8% |
| Pet search service |
0.7% |
| Pet walker service |
0.5% |
| Pet counselling service |
0.3% |
| None of the above |
78.3% |
Q7: Do you or your family have pet insurance? (Sample size=3,688, those currently with pets)
Dogs were about three times as likely to be insured as cats.
Q7SQ1: Why do you have pet insurance? (Sample size=219, those currently with pet insurance, multiple answer)
| Just in case something happened |
67.6% |
| Vet bills are lower |
56.6% |
| Pet got injured, ill |
42.0% |
| Pet shop recommended it |
19.6% |
| Often go to the vet |
13.7% |
| Pet got older |
8.2% |
| Vet recommended it |
8.2% |
| Saw it on TV, newspaper, magazine, internet, etc |
5.0% |
| Friends recommended it |
3.2% |
| Other |
1.4% |
| No particular reason |
1.8% |
Q7SQ2: What factors are important when buying pet insurance? (Sample size=219, those currently with pet insurance, multiple answer)
| Details of benefits |
51.6% |
| Monthly fees |
51.1% |
| Entry requirements (pet health, etc) |
31.5% |
| Number of vets in the scheme |
31.5% |
| Age of pets that can be insured |
25.6% |
| Kind of pets that can be insured |
24.2% |
| Quality of plan |
23.3% |
| Simplicity of application procedures |
18.3% |
| Trustworthiness of insurance company |
16.9% |
| Good riders in policy |
15.1% |
| Insurance company’s customer service |
12.3% |
| Had discount system (discount for microchipped pets, etc) |
11.9% |
| Other |
0.0% |
| Nothing in particular |
10.0% |
Q7SQ3: Why have you never had pet insurance? (Sample size=3,352, those who never had pet insurance, multiple answer)
| High fees |
32.5% |
| Almost never take pet to the vet |
18.0% |
| Didn’t know there was pet insurance |
11.6% |
| No insurance available for my kind of pet |
7.2% |
| Pet was too old to join |
4.3% |
| Details of benefits were poor |
3.2% |
| Pet already had an injury, disease so couldn’t enter |
2.1% |
| Other |
3.6% |
| No particular reason |
36.1% |
This ends the questions for current pet owners; the last question is for non-owners.
Q8: Would you want to keep a pet in the future? (Sample size=6,813, those with no pet currently)
| Want to have one |
40.4% |
| Don’t want to have one |
35.2% |
| Don’t know |
24.4% |
Younger people were keener on pets, and women more than men.
Read more on: dimsdrive research,
pet
Permalink
I heard a disturbing story from someone who used to teach in Japan that a vehicle comes around (daily, weekly, monthly?) and announces on a loud speaker that they will
take your pet if you no longer want them and euthanise them. Being an animal lover I was horrified! Come around asking to put away your animal like they’re picking up garbage? I always thought the Japanese were more civil than that. It’s too sad, really.
Patty, I think someone was having you on! I’ve never heard of such a thing.
I’ve lived in Japan for 12 years, I am half Japanese, and I speak Japanese, and I have never seen/heard anything even remotely close to what you heard from this “somebody”. Please do not judge an entire nation of people because of something that you simply heard from somebody, that isn’t even true.