This recent survey from DIMSDRIVE Research into pets had interesting information regarding insurance, but sadly the number of pets per person were not reported, a figure that would have helped in understanding some of the numbers.
Demographics
Between the 11th and 26th of March 2009 10,501 members of the DIMSDRIVE monitor group completed a private internet-based questionnaire. The sample was 50:50 male and female (one more female than male, but she was lost in rounding), 1.1% were in their teens, 13.1% in their twenties, 33.8% in their thirties, 30.6% in their forties, 14.7% in their fifties, and 6.7% aged sixty or older. Additional demographic information included 51.4% lived in a house, 33.5% in a flat, 12.7% in an apartment, and 2.4% in other accommodation.
I really don’t like pet shops in Japan at all; the cages on display are far too small, and they take the animals away from their mothers too early - about six weeks is the standard figure, while they are still cute enough to sell. I remember last year seeing one male kitten that was so desparate for mother’s milk that it had taken to sucking his own nipple, pulling out a lot of his own hair and leaving a big ugly raw-red mark on his chest.
Research results
Q1: Do you have a pet? (Sample size=10,501)
| Yes |
35.1% |
| Used to have but not now (to Q8) |
43.3% |
| Never (to Q8) |
21.6% |
The bigger the family, the more chance of having a pet; only 17.5% of people living alone had one, yet 47.6% of families of five or more people had one. Similarly, those living in houses were more likely to have pets than those in shared accommodation.
Q2: What kinds of pet do you have? (Sample size=3,688, those currently with pets, multiple answer)
| Dog |
46.0% |
| Cat |
31.9% |
| Goldfish, koi carp |
14.6% |
| Tropical fish |
9.5% |
| Tortoise, turtle |
7.0% |
| Bird |
6.4% |
| Other fish |
5.1% |
| Hamster, marmott |
4.9% |
| Rabbit |
4.8% |
| Insect |
2.8% |
| Amphibian, reptile |
1.5% |
| Ferret |
1.0% |
| Other small animal |
0.6% |
| Squirrel |
0.5% |
| Other |
1.2% |
Q3: Why do you have a pet? (Sample size=3,688, those currently with pets, multiple answer)
| Healing |
83.4% |
| Things are more fun |
39.2% |
| Inter-family talk increased |
39.0% |
| Home has become brighter |
33.2% |
| Not lonely |
23.5% |
| Useful for children’s upbringing |
19.3% |
| Friends have increased thanks to the pet |
13.9% |
| Useful for crime prevention |
10.4% |
| Fixed problem of a lack of exercise |
9.2% |
| Lifestyle has become more regular |
8.0% |
| Other |
0.9% |
| Nothing in particular |
6.5% |
Q4: About how much do you spend per month on your pet? (Sample size=3,688, those currently with pets)
| Up to 1,000 yen |
22.5% |
| Up to 3,000 yen |
26.4% |
| Up to 5,000 yen |
19.7% |
| Up to 8,000 yen |
6.6% |
| Up to 10,000 yen |
10.2% |
| Up to 20,000 yen |
4.1% |
| 20,000 yen or more |
2.5% |
| Don’t know |
8.0% |
The question does not make it clear if the cost was per pet or the sum of all pets per respondent.
Cats were cheaper than dogs, with 40.6% of people owned by cats spending less than 3,000 yen, whereas only 31.8% of dog owners spent that little.
Q5: Where do you usually buy pet food, pet goods, etc? (Sample size=3,688, those currently with pets, multiple answer)
| Home centre, discount store |
70.5% |
| Pet shop |
26.7% |
| Supermarket |
25.9% |
| Internet |
18.6% |
| Drug store |
16.4% |
| Pet goods shop |
12.7% |
| Vet clinic |
7.5% |
| Convenience store |
2.0% |
| Department store |
1.5% |
| Pet grooming salon |
1.3% |
| Other delivery |
0.9% |
| Other |
0.9% |
| Don’t buy pet food, pet goods |
1.5% |
Q6: Which of the following services do you often use? (Sample size=3,688, those currently with pets, multiple answer)
| Pet grooming |
17.4% |
| Pet hotel |
6.1% |
| Pet sitter |
0.9% |
| Pet massage service |
0.8% |
| Pet search service |
0.7% |
| Pet walker service |
0.5% |
| Pet counselling service |
0.3% |
| None of the above |
78.3% |
Q7: Do you or your family have pet insurance? (Sample size=3,688, those currently with pets)
Dogs were about three times as likely to be insured as cats.
Q7SQ1: Why do you have pet insurance? (Sample size=219, those currently with pet insurance, multiple answer)
| Just in case something happened |
67.6% |
| Vet bills are lower |
56.6% |
| Pet got injured, ill |
42.0% |
| Pet shop recommended it |
19.6% |
| Often go to the vet |
13.7% |
| Pet got older |
8.2% |
| Vet recommended it |
8.2% |
| Saw it on TV, newspaper, magazine, internet, etc |
5.0% |
| Friends recommended it |
3.2% |
| Other |
1.4% |
| No particular reason |
1.8% |
Q7SQ2: What factors are important when buying pet insurance? (Sample size=219, those currently with pet insurance, multiple answer)
| Details of benefits |
51.6% |
| Monthly fees |
51.1% |
| Entry requirements (pet health, etc) |
31.5% |
| Number of vets in the scheme |
31.5% |
| Age of pets that can be insured |
25.6% |
| Kind of pets that can be insured |
24.2% |
| Quality of plan |
23.3% |
| Simplicity of application procedures |
18.3% |
| Trustworthiness of insurance company |
16.9% |
| Good riders in policy |
15.1% |
| Insurance company’s customer service |
12.3% |
| Had discount system (discount for microchipped pets, etc) |
11.9% |
| Other |
0.0% |
| Nothing in particular |
10.0% |
Q7SQ3: Why have you never had pet insurance? (Sample size=3,352, those who never had pet insurance, multiple answer)
| High fees |
32.5% |
| Almost never take pet to the vet |
18.0% |
| Didn’t know there was pet insurance |
11.6% |
| No insurance available for my kind of pet |
7.2% |
| Pet was too old to join |
4.3% |
| Details of benefits were poor |
3.2% |
| Pet already had an injury, disease so couldn’t enter |
2.1% |
| Other |
3.6% |
| No particular reason |
36.1% |
This ends the questions for current pet owners; the last question is for non-owners.
Q8: Would you want to keep a pet in the future? (Sample size=6,813, those with no pet currently)
| Want to have one |
40.4% |
| Don’t want to have one |
35.2% |
| Don’t know |
24.4% |
Younger people were keener on pets, and women more than men.
Read more on: dimsdrive research,
pet
I heard a disturbing story from someone who used to teach in Japan that a vehicle comes around (daily, weekly, monthly?) and announces on a loud speaker that they will
take your pet if you no longer want them and euthanise them. Being an animal lover I was horrified! Come around asking to put away your animal like they’re picking up garbage? I always thought the Japanese were more civil than that. It’s too sad, really.
Patty, I think someone was having you on! I’ve never heard of such a thing.