<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WiMAX known by just one in fifteen Japanese</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatjapanthinks.com/2009/03/16/wimax-known-by-just-one-in-fifteen-japanese/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2009/03/16/wimax-known-by-just-one-in-fifteen-japanese/</link>
	<description>From kimono to keitai; research Japanese facts and figures through translated opinion polls and surveys.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 22:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2009/03/16/wimax-known-by-just-one-in-fifteen-japanese/comment-page-1/#comment-154140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatjapanthinks.com/?p=1667#comment-154140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yikes! That&#039;s really not a lot of penetration for a revolutionary product going to market. I would have expected pretty much universal knowledge of it in a place like Japan, at least in the under-40 crowd. Wouldn&#039;t be quite so surprised to see such numbers here in Canada though, where I&#039;m trying to raise start-up capital to build a nationwide WiMAX network, and so far have managed to raise a grand total of CAD$0.00.

As for what it is, WiMAX (IEEE 802.16 specification) is a networking protocol operating in the 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands, that offers a theoretical potential performance of 300Mb/s over a range of up to 48km, non-line-of-sight. In real-world implementations, the range is hampered by the composition of obstructions, but even so, a grid spaced 10-15km between nodes could provide ample coverage for an urban or suburban area, with higher through-put at a much lower cost than Wi-Fi or 3G wireless technologies such as EvDO, or even wired technologies such as cable or DSL, especially if WiMAX networking technology is combined with a mesh network architecture. It is the only networking technology that can cost-effectively service sparsely populated rural areas, as well as wilderness areas benefiting trekkers, rescue, fire suppression and emergency services personnel, and the military.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes! That&#8217;s really not a lot of penetration for a revolutionary product going to market. I would have expected pretty much universal knowledge of it in a place like Japan, at least in the under-40 crowd. Wouldn&#8217;t be quite so surprised to see such numbers here in Canada though, where I&#8217;m trying to raise start-up capital to build a nationwide WiMAX network, and so far have managed to raise a grand total of CAD$0.00.</p>
<p>As for what it is, WiMAX (IEEE 802.16 specification) is a networking protocol operating in the 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands, that offers a theoretical potential performance of 300Mb/s over a range of up to 48km, non-line-of-sight. In real-world implementations, the range is hampered by the composition of obstructions, but even so, a grid spaced 10-15km between nodes could provide ample coverage for an urban or suburban area, with higher through-put at a much lower cost than Wi-Fi or 3G wireless technologies such as EvDO, or even wired technologies such as cable or DSL, especially if WiMAX networking technology is combined with a mesh network architecture. It is the only networking technology that can cost-effectively service sparsely populated rural areas, as well as wilderness areas benefiting trekkers, rescue, fire suppression and emergency services personnel, and the military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
