<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is considered personal information in Japan?</title>
	<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2008/05/20/what-is-considered-personal-information-in-japan/</link>
	<description>From kimono to keitai; research Japanese facts and figures through translated opinion polls and surveys.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2008/05/20/what-is-considered-personal-information-in-japan/#comment-88094</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 04:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2008/05/20/what-is-considered-personal-information-in-japan/#comment-88094</guid>
		<description>One good idea I heard here in the US. If the junk mail contains a postage-paid return envelope, stuff as much of the junk in there- minus the information asked for, of course- as possible and send it back to them. Don't know if it actually works to discourage future mailings, but I can imagine the thought of them paying to take their own stuff back is pleasurable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One good idea I heard here in the US. If the junk mail contains a postage-paid return envelope, stuff as much of the junk in there- minus the information asked for, of course- as possible and send it back to them. Don&#8217;t know if it actually works to discourage future mailings, but I can imagine the thought of them paying to take their own stuff back is pleasurable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
