<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Portals and shopping sites most trusted in Japanese internet</title>
	<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2008/01/18/portals-and-shopping-sites-most-trusted-in-japanese-internet/</link>
	<description>From kimono to keitai; research Japanese facts and figures through translated opinion polls and surveys.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken Y-N</title>
		<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2008/01/18/portals-and-shopping-sites-most-trusted-in-japanese-internet/#comment-54577</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Y-N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2008/01/18/portals-and-shopping-sites-most-trusted-in-japanese-internet/#comment-54577</guid>
		<description>Candadai: yes, given that other surveys have shown over 80% trust in Wikipedia, its poor showing here is a bit of a surprise!

Drew: Well, Yahoo! Japan is a good source for TV, weather, train times, tickets, etc, even if its search is useless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Candadai: yes, given that other surveys have shown over 80% trust in Wikipedia, its poor showing here is a bit of a surprise!</p>
<p>Drew: Well, Yahoo! Japan is a good source for TV, weather, train times, tickets, etc, even if its search is useless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2008/01/18/portals-and-shopping-sites-most-trusted-in-japanese-internet/#comment-53966</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2008/01/18/portals-and-shopping-sites-most-trusted-in-japanese-internet/#comment-53966</guid>
		<description>This seems to validate my theory that Japanese people automatically use Yahoo for everything; it is in their DNA or something...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems to validate my theory that Japanese people automatically use Yahoo for everything; it is in their DNA or something&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lilyqueen</title>
		<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2008/01/18/portals-and-shopping-sites-most-trusted-in-japanese-internet/#comment-53938</link>
		<dc:creator>lilyqueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2008/01/18/portals-and-shopping-sites-most-trusted-in-japanese-internet/#comment-53938</guid>
		<description>Not Japundit, that's to be sure....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not Japundit, that&#8217;s to be sure&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candadai Tirumalai</title>
		<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2008/01/18/portals-and-shopping-sites-most-trusted-in-japanese-internet/#comment-53877</link>
		<dc:creator>Candadai Tirumalai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2008/01/18/portals-and-shopping-sites-most-trusted-in-japanese-internet/#comment-53877</guid>
		<description>I see that Yahoo and Google top the list and that the first is more than twice as popular as the second. I can say from personal experience that when I have sought to verify a quotation in English those two sources have seldom failed me. The relatively low ranking given Wikepedia comes as a bit of a surprise. It can be a starting point, provided one does not make it one's sole source.  Of course its Japanese entries may leave much to be desired. Two days ago there was a column in the London "Times" by Magnus Linklater in which he stressed that the Wiki  benefits from  constant  correction and refinement  by its readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that Yahoo and Google top the list and that the first is more than twice as popular as the second. I can say from personal experience that when I have sought to verify a quotation in English those two sources have seldom failed me. The relatively low ranking given Wikepedia comes as a bit of a surprise. It can be a starting point, provided one does not make it one&#8217;s sole source.  Of course its Japanese entries may leave much to be desired. Two days ago there was a column in the London &#8220;Times&#8221; by Magnus Linklater in which he stressed that the Wiki  benefits from  constant  correction and refinement  by its readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
