Japanese phones: love the looks, hate the dearth of features

Advertisement

How satisfied are you with your current mobile phone? graph of japanese opinionMyVoice recently reported on the results of a survey into the matter of mobile phones. It may be of interest to cross-reference with yesterday’s translation of a similarly-themed MyVoice survey into mobile phone service provider image.

Demographics

13,252 people from MyVoice’s internet community answered the questionnaire between the 1st and 5th of February. 54% of the sample was female, 2% in their teens, 19% in their twenties, 40% in their thirties, 25% in their forties, and 14% in their fifties.

The two main problems I find with mobile phones are first, even if you stay with the same service provider and the same mobile phone maker, even just a minor model upgrade can mean that the internal software is completely rewritten, and one needs to relearn the quirks of the new email system or character input methods. Second, new models sometimes see not just a feature rewrite, but a degradation in usability. For example, my old phone allowed me to check what the particular ring tone setting were for each contact group in my phone book; now I cannot. I know from working with other projects that usability sadly seems to come pretty low down in the pecking order when designing software.

Survey Results

Q1: Which service provider’s phone do you use? If multiple providers, answer for the one you use the most. (Sample size=13,252)

au (KDDI) 26.7%
NTT DoCoMo 44.0%
SoftBank 19.6%
WILLCOM 2.6%
Other 1.1%
Don’t use any 6.0%

Q2: What maker’s mobile phone do you use? If multiple phones, answer for the one you use the most. (Sample size=mobile phone users)

Sharp 20.8%
Panasonic 14.0%
NEC 13.2%
Toshiba 11.5%
Sony Ericsson 7.8%
Sanyo 7.2%
Kyocera 5.4%
Mitsubishi 4.5%
Fujitsu 4.4%
Casio 4.4%
Hitachi 2.8%
Nokia 0.4%
Motorola 0.2%
Other 1.2%
Don’t know 2.2%
No answer 0.2%

Q3: How satisfied are you with your current phone? If multiple phones, answer for the one you use the most. (Sample size=mobile phone users)

Extremely satisfied (to SQ1) 10.4%
Somewhat satisfied (to SQ1) 64.6%
A little dissatisfied (to SQ2) 20.1%
Extremely dissatisfied (to SQ2) 4.5%
No answer 0.4%

Q3SQ1: What aspects are you satisfied with? (Sample size=satisfied users, up to three answers)

Phone design or colour 53.6%
Ease of use, ease of understanding 43.0%
Breadth of features 29.9%
Display crispness, size 24.1%
Feel of the phone 17.2%
Screen or character readability 16.7%
Size 15.5%
Thinness/thickness 14.1%
Camera performance 13.8%
Weight 12.1%
User interface design 11.1%
Robustness 9.3%
Other 5.5%
No answer 0.8%

Q3SQ2: What aspects are you dissatisfied with? (Sample size=dissatisfied users, multiple answers)

Breadth of features 34.6%
Ease of use, ease of understanding 30.7%
Camera performance 24.8%
Thinness/thickness 20.6%
Weight 20.5%
Phone design or colour 17.3%
Robustness 12.8%
Display crispness, size 12.5%
Size 11.7%
User interface design 8.7%
Feel of the phone 7.4%
Screen or character readability 7.4%
Other 26.3%
No answer 0.5%

Q4: Next time you upgrade, which maker’s phone do you want to buy? (Sample size=mobile phone users)

Sharp 16.3%
Panasonic 8.7%
NEC 8.6%
Sony Ericsson 5.9%
Toshiba 4.1%
Casio 2.4%
Kyocera 2.1%
Sanyo 1.4%
Fujitsu 1.3%
Mitsubishi 1.2%
Nokia 0.9%
Hitachi 0.7%
Motorola 0.6%
Other 0.4%
Don’t know 45.1%
No answer 0.4%

Q5: When buying a mobile phone, how aware are you of who the handset manufacturer is? (Sample size=13,252)

Extremely aware 19.8%
A little aware 43.7%
Not very aware 26.6%
Not aware at all 8.0%
No answer 1.9%
Read more on:

Custom Search

Leave a Comment