<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Japan needs babes!</title>
	<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2006/05/14/japan-needs-babes/</link>
	<description>From kimono to keitai; research Japanese facts and figures through translated opinion polls and surveys.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken Y-N</title>
		<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2006/05/14/japan-needs-babes/#comment-7574</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Y-N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2006/05/14/japan-needs-babes/#comment-7574</guid>
		<description>mac, I did mean babe, as in infant or baby, but of course the play on the two meanings of the word was one of the reasons for my choice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mac, I did mean babe, as in infant or baby, but of course the play on the two meanings of the word was one of the reasons for my choice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mac</title>
		<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2006/05/14/japan-needs-babes/#comment-7519</link>
		<dc:creator>mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2006/05/14/japan-needs-babes/#comment-7519</guid>
		<description>I think you mean, "Japan needs Babies". 

Japan has plenty of 'babes'. We love them. They are beautiful. 

The problem is just that they are not procreating enough to make 'babies'!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you mean, &#8220;Japan needs Babies&#8221;. </p>
<p>Japan has plenty of &#8216;babes&#8217;. We love them. They are beautiful. </p>
<p>The problem is just that they are not procreating enough to make &#8216;babies&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; &#19990;&#35542; What Japan Thinks</title>
		<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2006/05/14/japan-needs-babes/#comment-1814</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; &#19990;&#35542; What Japan Thinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 13:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2006/05/14/japan-needs-babes/#comment-1814</guid>
		<description>[...] Following up on my recent report into Japanese demographics, in particular the lack of children, here is the results of a survey from the Meiji Yasuda Institute of Life and Wellness, Inc on the views of young Japanese (between the ages of 20 and 39) on marriage, birth and divorce. In February of this year they surveyed 759 people (I think it was by face-to-face interviews, but it is not clear from the survey) from the Tokyo, Saitama, Chiba and Kanagawa areas (basically the capital city and surrounding prefectures). As the detailed demographics are important to this survey, I&#8217;ll present them within the main text. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Following up on my recent report into Japanese demographics, in particular the lack of children, here is the results of a survey from the Meiji Yasuda Institute of Life and Wellness, Inc on the views of young Japanese (between the ages of 20 and 39) on marriage, birth and divorce. In February of this year they surveyed 759 people (I think it was by face-to-face interviews, but it is not clear from the survey) from the Tokyo, Saitama, Chiba and Kanagawa areas (basically the capital city and surrounding prefectures). As the detailed demographics are important to this survey, I&#8217;ll present them within the main text. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Castorp</title>
		<link>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2006/05/14/japan-needs-babes/#comment-1674</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Castorp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 09:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatjapanthinks.com/2006/05/14/japan-needs-babes/#comment-1674</guid>
		<description>I doubt the 105:100 male/female imbalance signifies anything other than that Japan's super-low infant mortality has uncovered the natural surplus of male childbirths which occur in any population (males are more fragile).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt the 105:100 male/female imbalance signifies anything other than that Japan&#8217;s super-low infant mortality has uncovered the natural surplus of male childbirths which occur in any population (males are more fragile).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
